Home - Research Facilities - Data Management - MERLIM - Tasks - Diagnostics - Task 2.3


 
Bio availability
Diagnostics
  Task 2.1
  Task 2.2
  Task 2.3
  Task 2.4
Synergistic effects
Field evaluation

Sitemap - Search 

 

Task 2.3 Carbon isotope fractionation

 

Laboratory studies.

The objective of this task has been to develop, calibrate, and apply carbon isotope fractionation (e p) as a diagnostic tool with which to characterise the nutritional status of model phytoplankton species with respect to CO2. To achieve this objective we examined the influence of various environmental and cell physiological factors on stable carbon isotope fractionation in marine phytoplankton. These include effects of i) CO2 concentration, [CO2aq], ii) growth rate, iii) light/dark cycles, iv) photon flux density, v) cell size, vi) nutrient availability, and vii) differences in carbon acquisition mechanisms (see Burkhardt et al. 1999, in press; Kukert and Riebesell 1998; Riebesell et al. subm. a; b). Summarising the results of this work leads to the following conclusions:

1. Carbon isotope fractionation is species-specific. In particular, factors such as cell size, cell geometry, the mechanism of inorganic carbon acquisition, the type of carboxylating enzyme (RUBISCO type I or II, beta-carboxylases) significantly affect the isotopic signal incorporated during organic matter production (Burkhardt et al. in press). Based on these (and other) findings it has become evident that any application of isotope fractionation in the field has to account for possible signals in the carbon isotope composition d13C which are due to species-specific effects. In general, this makes the use of the isotopic signal in bulk organic matter rather impractical and highlights the need to focus on species- or group-specific biomarkers (e.g. alkenones). The relationship of the isotopic signal in alkenones relative to that in total organic matter was investigated by Riebesell et al. (subm. b). The study shows that alkenone d13C closely follows isotope fractionation responses of the whole cell organic matter. However, the offset between d13C in alkenones and in bulk organic matter can differ depending on growth conditions.

2. Carbon isotope fractionation is dependent on the light climate experienced by the algal cell. Photon flux density (Riebesell in prep.) and the light/dark cycle (Burkhardt et al. in press) strongly influence active transport of inorganic carbon into the cell and, in consequence, isotope fractionation by the cell. Specifically, when considering the ranges typically occurring in the natural environment, the effect of differences in light conditions can be several-fold stronger than that of changes in [CO2aq] (Burkhardt et al. in press b, Riebesell in prep.). Thus, interpretation of carbon isotope data requires knowledge of the light climate prevailing during photosynthetic carbon fixation.

3. Carbon isotope fractionation is affected by the nutritional status of the algal cells. For a given growth rate and [CO2aq], ep differs depending on the growth limiting factor (Kukert and Riebesell 1998; Riebesell et al. subm. a). Specifically, strong differences in isotope fractionation were obtained in light- versus nitrate-limited cells under identical growth rates and CO2 concentrations. Based on these findings a conceptual model was developed (Riebesell et al. subm. a) in which isotope fractionation is largely a function of energy (light) supply over nutrient availability (via energy controlling transport processes and nutrients controlling organic matter production). This hypothetical model needs rigorous testing.

In summary, carbon isotope fractionation is a multi-factorial process. Based on the findings made in the framework of the MERLIM project, the present concept of isotope fractionation largely being a function of the ratio of growth rate and CO2 concentration needs to be modified. Although the potential influence of these two factors on isotope fractionation is still supported by the results of this project, it has become evident that other factors are equally important in determining the isotopic signal. Their effects are quantitatively in the same range or even greater than those of growth rate and [CO2aq]. Thus, with respect to the objective of this project, i.e. to develop and calibrate carbon isotope fractionation as a diagnostic tool with which to characterise the CO2 nutritional status of model phytoplankton species, the outcome of this work is negative. Under most practical purposes, the complexity of the processes involved in carbon isotope fractionation make it extremely difficult to use carbon isotope data as a diagnostic tool to characterise the CO2 availability for marine phytoplankton.

 

 

Field studies.

The Centre des Faibles Radioactivités acted as a subcontractor to the AWI (Bremerhaven). CFR was involved in all aspects relating to the development and application of carbon isotopes as a diagnostic tool. In this context, CFR has paid attention to

    1. the influence of metabolic processes on carbon isotope fractionation in phytoplankton during mineral carbon fixation and transport, and
    2. the relationship between growth rate and carbon isotopic fractionation.

With the exception of one field study of phytoplankton isotopic fractionation in a Norwegian fjord (Kukert and Riebesell 1998), research activities of the AWI group have focused on the analysis of isotope fractionation in monospecific laboratory cultures. In contrast, the approach developed by the CFR group to investigate the correlation of ep with environmental parameters is mainly based on field studies in the open ocean. If CO2 was the driving factor to determine the isotopic signal in bulk organic matter, a close correlation between ep and [CO2aq] would be expected. Any heterogeneity of factors such as species composition, light climate, or nutritional status (see above), on the other hand, might cause considerable variation in stable carbon isotope fractionation which cannot be accounted for by differences in [CO2aq].

During the last two years, we had the opportunity to participate in several cruises in the Indian Ocean and notably in the Somalian upwelling area (MOZAPHARE-PEGASOM cruise, July, 1996), in the south Atlantic Ocean ( NAUSICAA, October, 1996), and in the Pacific Ocean (IPHIS, June 1997). Simultaneous measurements of carbon dioxide partial pressure (pCO2), sea surface temperatures (SST) and salinities, carbon isotopic composition of both phytoplankton and total dissolved mineral carbon, chlorophyll and organic carbon concentration, allowed examination of the relationship between [CO2aq], growth rate (or biomass), and carbon isotope fractionation. The aim of these studies was to provide a large data set that can be compared with results obtained in culture experiments or derived from models giving a way to validate this estimates and/or to extrapolate to the global ocean phytoplanton populations.

From this data set (>200) it appears that the measurements of [CO2aq] (calculated from pCO2) in the global ocean surface waters are close to the values corresponding to equilibrium between surface sea water and and atmosphere expected in the upwelling areas. The large data set covering wide oceanic areas, different seasons and ecosystems can account for the global scale equilibrium hypothesis excluding systematic bias by sampling only high pCO2 areas in the ocean. The good agreement between theoretical [CO2aq] and polynomial fit between measured [CO2aq] and SST confirms this hypothesis (Bentaleb and Fontugne 1996, Bentaleb et al in prep.). By comparing to the theoretical equilibrium curve calculated for preindustrial period, these results show the anthropogenic CO2 invasion of surface ocean. The d13C values show that phytoplankton recorded the anthropogenic CO2 and present also a good agreement with the theoretical curve as shown by the polynomial fit agreement between d13C and SST (Bentaleb and Fontugne 1996, Bentaleb et al. in prep.). However, a wide scattering of d13C values is observed indicating that factors other than CO2 had a significant effect on stable carbon isotope fractionation in natural phytoplankton of the open ocean. Fractionation lower than predicted from the empirical relationship with CO2 is clearly illustrated in the upwelling areas. In this area, CO2aq concentrations are high and d13C values appear to be independent of this parameter but covary with chlorophyll or particulate organic carbon concentrations in surface water.

 

References:

Bentaleb, I. and M. Fontugne e (1996) Anthropogenic CO2 invasion of the surface Ocean: its influence on the organic carbon isotope composition of phytoplankton. C.R. Acad Sci Paris, Ser.II, 322, 743-748.

Bentaleb,I. M. R. Fontugne, G. Haddad,, C. Descolas-Gros, C. Riaux-Gobin Carbon isotopic composition of phytoplankton, a sensitive indicator of anthropogenic CO2 invasion of the surface Ocean ? (in prep).

Burkhardt, S., Riebesell, U., Zondervan, I. (in press). Effects of growth rate, CO2 concentration, and cell size on the stable carbon isotope fractionation in marine phytoplankton. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 63 (19/20).

Burkhardt, S., Riebesell, U., Zondervan, I. (1999). Stable carbon isotope fractionation by the marine phytoplankton in response to day-length, carbon assimilation rate, and CO2 availability. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 184: 31-41.

Kukert, H. and Riebesell, U. (1998). Phytoplankton carbon isotope fractionation during a diatom spring bloom. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 173: 127-137.

Riebesell, U., Burkhardt, S., Kroon, B. (submitted, a) Carbon isotope fractionation by a marine diatom: dependence on the growth rate limiting resource. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser.

Riebesell, U., Revill, A.T., Holdsworth, D.G., and Volkman, J.K. (submitted, b) The effect of varying CO2 concentration on lipid composition and carbon isotope fractionation in Emiliania huxleyi. Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta.

Riebesell, U. (in prep.). Differences in carbon acquisition and isotope fractionation among marine diatoms. Limnol. Oceanogr.

 

Data
phaeodactylum.xls
phaeodactylum2.xls
gephyrocapsa.xls
skeletonema.xls
skeletonema2.xls
thallissiosira.xls
emiliania.xls
emiliania2.xls